![]() |
Program on
|
![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() Jim Mabon, MRL, University of Illinois ![]() SEM picture of pitted area on a Gordianus coin ![]() Typical ancient coin composition ![]() Ancient Valerian coin (left) vs. modern coin (right) |
A group of
40 Roman coins was borrowed from Loras College Library in Dubuque, Iowa
to ascertain composition and minting technology. Participants in the
project were Sarah Wisseman (ATAM Program, University of Illinois),
Suzanne Seleem (Chemistry, Central State University of Ohio), James
Mabon (Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois), and
Karin Berkhoudt (ATAM and Anthropology, University of Illinois).
The coins belong to a larger collection, purchased by Father
Kenneth Downing in the 1970s during his travels to Turkey and other
parts of the Mediterranean. Many have been identified by Geoffrey
Harrison of Classical Studies at Loras College. We selected 5-10 silver
and copper-based coins from the reigns of Valerian (253-260 AD),
Licinius (308-324 AD), Gallienus (253-260 AD), Maximinus II (305-313
AD), Constantine (307/312-337 AD), and Gordianus III (238-244 AD). Roman coins were frequently recycled in antiquity by melting
them down and making new objects from the combined alloys. While we
cannot trace coins back to original ores without much more information
on original provenance (meaning both the sources of metallic ores and
the sites of coin manufacture), we can learn something about the
composition, corrosion products, and manufacturing methods. For
example,
from the existing literature on ancient Roman coins, we know that many
silver coins in later periods consisted of silver foil over a copper
core. The forty coins were examined non-destructively by binocular
microscope at ATAM and scanning electron microscopy and
energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDX) at the Center for
Microanalysis in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory
(MRL) at the University of Illinois.**SEM gives high-resolution images
while EDX identifies the major elements present. One coin turned out to be brass (copper-zinc). Two coins were
identified as forgeries. In addition to suspiciously clean surfaces,
these coins displayed almost pure copper and silver instead of the
mixed alloys of the ancient coins (either copper-tin bronze with small
amounts
of lead and silver, or silver with a little copper). Most of the ancient coins showed small amounts of earth
elements such as Fe, Ca, Al, Mg, O, presumably from dirt still adhering
to the coins. At least two corrosion products were present, revealed by
Cl (chlorine from copper choride) on copper and S (sulphur from copper
sulphide). Our findings are consistent with other published studies of
ancient Roman coins. More data could be acquired using destructive
sampling (e.g. metallography or PIXE) that would allow a better
understanding of which coins were foil-wrapped. Any further study
should allow for a thorough cleaning of each coin surface to get
clearer readings of the constituent metals. This procedure would then
require recoating with a protective substance to prevent corrosion. Further Reading:
Zwicker, U.; Oddy, A.; and La Niece, S.
Roman techniques of manufacturing silver-plated coins.
In book. Metal plating and patination. La Niece, Susan and
Craddock,
Paul T., Editors (1993), pp. 223-246, [English]. [ISBN 0750616113]. Carter, Giles F. and Razi, Hossein.
Chemical composition of copper-based coins of the Roman Republic,
217-31 BC.
In book. Archaeological chemistry IV. Advances in chemistry series.
Allen, Ralph O. (Editor). American Chemical Society (1989), pp.
214-230, [English w. English summary]. 13 figs., 2 tables, 15 refs.
[ISBN 0-8412-1449-2]. Klockenkämper, R.; Bubert, H.; and Hasler, K.
Detection of near-surface silver enrichment on Roman imperial silver
coins by x-ray spectral analysis. Archaeometry, 41, no. 2
(1999), pp. 311-320, [English w.
English
summary]. 3 figs., refs. **This facility is partially supported by the U.S. Department
of Energy
under grant DEFG02-91-ER45439. |